NAHRO - Building Communities Together for 75 Years

Site Tools:

Calendar Calendar

Contact Information Contact Information

Site Map Site Map

Site Search Site Search

NAHRO Homepage NAHRO Home

About NAHRO
Legislative/Regulations
Member Services
Join NAHRO
Conference/Seminars
Professional Development
Transpire, Inc.
Publications/Resources
Programs & Policies

Affordable Housing

Community Development

Public Housing

Rental Assistance/
Section 8

Other Programs


Press Room

 Members Login Here

Jobs
Advocacy
Committees
Email Lists
News
NAHRO Monitor
Small Agencies
Solutions Database

 

Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS)

On January 11, 2000, HUD issued the final rule for the Public Housing Assessment System (PHAS) regulation at 24 CFR part 902. PHAS is designed to serve as an oversight tool that will effectively measure the performance of public housing agencies. Using this new system as a basis, PHAs will be measured using HUD standards that are objective and uniform. To facilitate this objective, HUD has structured PHAS to evaluate four major areas.

The four PHAS components are:

  1. Physical Inspection Indicator - designed to ensure that PHAs meet the minimum standard of being decent, safe, and sanitary and in good repair (DSS/GR);
  2. Financial Condition Indicator - assesses the financial condition of public and assisted housing agencies;
  3. Management Operations Indicator; and
  4. Resident Satisfaction and Service Indicator - allowing for public housing resident assessment of PHA performance.

NAHRO Policy Position

HUD wants to use the public housing assessment system (PHAS) as an oversight tool to measure the performance of local housing authorities (LHAs) in four major areas: physical inspections, financial conditions, management operations, and resident satisfaction and service. The PHAS is being implemented now.

NAHRO believes HUD should delay implementation until problems in the PHAS protocol are resolved. Despite NAHRO's and congressional advocacy for a delay, HUD has moved ahead with implementation.

NAHRO has several areas of concern, including:

  1. The sample size used to test the revised PHAS,
  2. The technical capacity of HUD to receive electronic transmissions and provide assistance via telephone,
  3. The handling of appeals,
  4. The training of inspectors and field staff,
  5. Timing of physical inspections, and
  6. Assessment of financial conditions.

Legislators have added their voices to NAHRO's in an effort to delay implementation of the PHAS. Representatived Barney Frank (D-MO), John LaFalce (D-NY), James Leach (R-IA), and Rick Lazio (R-NY) wrote to HUD recommending a delay in implementation. The letter urged:

  1. Broader testing of the system,
  2. A fair appeals process,
  3. Ensurance that REAC is capable of dealing with the volume of communications it will receive, and,
  4. Adequate training of inspectors and field staff

M e m b e r s    L i n k s:

News Updates:

Monitor Issue: